Labfans是一个针对大学生、工程师和科研工作者的技术社区。 | 论坛首页 | 联系我们(Contact Us) |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
高级会员
注册日期: 2019-11-21
帖子: 3,006
声望力: 66 ![]() |
![]()
While it is still fresh in my mind, I want to describe the conversation I had with a publicly available version of ChatGPT, the much-discussed large language model, LLM, for conversational artificial intelligence.
Contents Mixed Reception A newer version of ChatGPT than the one I used is available to selected journalists and computer industry observers. Their reaction has been, shall I say, mixed. At first, some of the reports were positive and even ecstatic. Most of these early reports were from people whose primary concern is the stock market, not AI technology. Many of the more recent and more careful reports have been negative and critical. Where Is Sydney? I have given ChatGPT the nickname "Chad". Some early users of one of Chad's competitors asked deliberately provocative questions and encountered a cranky alter-ego named "Sydney". I didn't ask my Chad any unfair questions and didn't encounter any Sydney's. Me and AI I have been a long-time observer of -- although not a contributor to -- artificial intelligence research.
I talked to -- I should say chatted with, or actually typed at -- Chad for most of an hour on a recent evening. Think of Stephen Hawking in a Web Browser. Chad's responses were always courteous and conversational. And the majority of Chad's responses were factually correct. However, a surprising number of Chad's answers were just plain wrong. Some examples:
AI Winters Everybody wants to combine the conversational style offered by large language models with the reliability and breadth provided by Google. Now THAT sounds like a really good idea. Artificial intelligence has a history of flush successes interspersed with fallow periods known as AI Winters. I am afraid that continued obsession with Chat Bots might lead to another AI Winter. Truth Steve Eddins revealed the Truth behind ChatGPT with this internal MathWorks Yammer post. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |